Just-world hypothesis

Named and studied by social psychologist Melvin Lerner beginning in the 1960s, culminating in his 1980 book The Belief in a Just World. Lerner argued the belief is a comforting defense: if the world is fair, then we are safe as long as we behave well — which is why watching an innocent person suffer often pushes observers to decide the victim must have deserved it.

  1. noun · /JUST-WURLD hy-POTH-uh-sis/

    The largely unconscious belief that the world is fundamentally fair, so people generally get what they deserve and deserve what they get.

    It explains the impulse to blame victims — to assume that those who suffer must have done something to invite it — as a way of protecting our sense of a predictable world.

    His reaction to the layoffs — "they probably weren’t pulling their weight" — was the just-world hypothesis shielding him from the thought that it could happen to anyone.

    Victim blaming is the visible behavior; the just-world hypothesis is the underlying belief that makes that behavior feel reasonable.